Meet the Contributors

Receive the latest posts directly to your inbox every week!

Sign Up Now

Games of Betrayal

Review Corner Writers

Posted by Review Corner Writers on Mar 15, 2018

In Act I, Scene II of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare's titular character is warned about the Ides of March. As we all know, March 15th didn't turn out so well for him as he fell victim to betrayal and backstabbing -and all kinds of other stabbing. One of my favorite elements of board games is that they enable us to gather friends and family together, and then they let us act like a totally amoral dirt bag to them. Some folks don't care for games where double-dealing, treachery, and outright lying are the done thing, but if you play in the kinds of groups I like to play in, those elements are shoehorned into every game from Carcassonne to Ticket to Ride. So in honor of this most backstab-y month, I asked a couple of our Review Corner writers to tell us about some of their favorite moments of outstanding Caesarian intrigue in their favorite games.

Michael Barnes

Review Corner Editor-in-Chief

Michael

In one of my groups, I have a longstanding and hard-won reputation for being completely untrustworthy and opportunistic. One of our longest running jokes hails back to an early play of the Starcraft board game where I offered to be "Starcraft Buddies" with my friend, shortly before Zerg rushing him into oblivion while his guard was down. However, my all-time favorite slimeball act has to be when I took a HUGE bribe in the very first turn of a game of Stefan Dorra's classic Intrigue (a "fight in a box" that is sadly out of print and unavailable as of this publication) and promptly proceeded to honor absolutely none of my promises to this player. He was penniless and powerless for the rest of the game, and I had all of his money. It was hilarious, and fortunately he was a good sport about it.

There's really nothing else like Intrigue out there. The whole idea is that people pay you to give their relatives jobs in your manor, but you have multiple applicants and players are all trying to grease their way in with money. When it comes time to fill the roles, only one can take the position. Everyone else is exiled to the island. I love that this game is so purely focused on looking another player in the eyes and lying to them. The only other game I can think of that so perfectly and smoothly enables treachery and betrayal without much rules friction to stop you is the great Cosmic Encounter - a game that sometimes forces you to attack the player that helped you the most on the previous turn.

Drew

Some games seem born to backstabbing. Game of Thrones, Diplomacy, Munchkin. But the bitterest betrayals sometimes come when you don't expect them. It's about trains and stock prices. How cutthroat can Chicago Express be? The answer, my friends, is very. In one game, an opponent and I had equal shares of a particular railroad. We were marching hand in hand toward Chicago. Fast friends, like brothers really. We would share in the payout that comes from completing that destination and then lord it over the remaining competitors.

Just as we were about to reach our destination, he ends up buying another share. So now he'll benefit more than me. We both worked hard to make it happen, but now he was going to get the lion's share of the benefit. Well, screw that. My next turn involved building track to nowhere, using up the company's resources and making it impossible to reach Chicago. I cackled as his dreams turned to ash. Luckily, my portfolio was such that I could withstand the loss. His was not. The great railroad revenge is still whispered around my table whenever stocks go up for sale in Chicago Express.

Dan

Not every betrayal involves backstabbing; sometimes it's the heart you're after.

In one recent play of John Company, my family was steadily growing its investments and prestige. We had officers within the East India Company, their income supplemented by freebooting captains of our own. In order to buy the ships they would be sailing to India, we struck a bargain with another family of well-to-dos: they would underwrite the cost of a pair of oceangoing vessels, and we would join with them in holy matrimony as soon as one of our executives retired from the company. No need for messy contracts or the like. Just one hand joined with another and victory points earned for both parties. Beautiful.

Then our man retired from his posting earlier than anticipated. Our wallet was fat with the money we'd earned from our newly-outfitted captains, so the patriarch of our partnered family beamed proudly as he awaited news of the wedding. And we agreed to the union — provided he paid every last farthing of the cost.

The patriarch of the family we'd spurned was livid. Unfortunately for him, without any collateral, he had no recourse. We'd functionally embezzled half of his treasury, and would only reward him if he let us embezzle the other half. From that moment onward, it was a blood feud between us. If only he'd had the money to make good on his bluster.

Charlie

This was a rough one. In a game of Fief: France 1429, I had been schmoozing up to another with much platitudes and regular concessions. I was grooming him and his noble Francois for courtship, ready to marry off the bold Lady Abelone and forge an alliance that was meant to be broken (although only to me). Of course he fell for it - they always do.

We battled together across the French countryside, ousting the Pope his cushy stronghold and seizing fields of grain to fuel the war-machine. Fiefdoms were conquered and victory was close. Then it happened. When the night was at its darkest, the assassin struck. Lord Francois had his throat cut and lasted mere moments while Lady Abelone looked on in feigned horror. As our conjoined families dissolved in an instant, I qualified for individual victory and took the game.

The wounds were rife with salt when it's realized that we would have won as a team on the following turn with Francois being elected King. Anger from across the table was matched by devious satisfaction. Blood boiled and a lasting memory was forged. I have not found a suitor in Fief since.

Kyle

In Carcassonne, we have seen cities rise and fall, we have seen roads wither and fade into the weeds and dust. Once-great monasteries fall into ruin. But the most devastating thing in Carcassonne is not the passage of time as the game moves on, but the betrayal of a friend.

We had two players building a city side by side in an unspoken alliance. Whenever one of them drew a fitting city piece, they'd slap it down growing the city into one of the most valuable I'd ever seen in a game of Carc. Towards the end of the game, one of them put a meeple down close by on an open-ended city piece. No big deal, just building a separate city. Nothing to see here. Then, in a final stroke of deviousness, he connected the two, overpowering the friend's lone meeple and stealing all 60+ points for himself. Brutal! Never trust anyone in love or Carcassonne.

Craig

My clan of Spike the Murderer, Johan the Ill-Equipped and Bob the Poorly Used floundered through Arcadia Quest while a rival clan, led by Hobspawn, whose Boots of Brokenness allowed his player to seemingly activate his whole clan while the rest of us went one at a time, racked up a seemingly insurmountable lead heading into the finale.

Spike got to Lord Fang first, which is almost always a bad idea, but he did a lot of damage before dying. Hobspawn the Weasely then moved in for the kill, whittling down Lord Fang to near death, or whatever you call it for an undead creature. Enter Johan, replete with bows despite his ability because Spike the Melee God needed as many swords as he could get his hands on, and my loot hauls were poor. Johan entered the room, calmly took aim, and fired, drilling Hobspawn squarely in the back and killing him.

Oh, and the next turn Johan killed Fang. So my clan, despite not having won a single quest up to this point, won the game, because them’s the rules. And I didn't even get any reward for PvP in that dungeon. The book says it was a minor victory, but my sweet backstab right before the game-winning shot made it a major coup, reinforced by the angry glares of my fellow players.


Comments

Michael Barnes posted on 3/16/2018 2:31 PM
Hi David and Mike- thank you for your comments and thank you for reading! I'm the EIC here and I wanted to respond to your thoughts here. We try to come up with creative and sometimes unusual monthly features and I like for us to be able to present you not only with the "latest and greatest", but also sometimes some backcatalouge items you might have missed. We always try to feature games that are in stock and available here at Miniature Market, because we do want you to be able to have quick and easy access to those titles if something sounds interesting to you. I also think it is important to demonstrate that our writers have a wide range of opinions and experience- train politics might not be your thing, but I think our man Drew can make those kinds of games sound compelling and interesting. The directive I gave the writers here was to write a paragraph or two about memorable betrayals and the games that set up the opportunity for skullduggery- there was no specific requirement for the game to be recent. I felt like it was important to show how even a game like Carcassonne with certain people can turn into a nasty, treacherous experience. Please remember that these are opinions- for example, I'm not sure I've ever really seen any kind of specific betrayal in Lords of Waterdeep and would not have considered it myself for this feature- but you might have!

And I do think it is important to remind folks, especially those new to the hobby, that Cosmic Encounter is awesome!

I take our readers' comments and opinions to heart - we want to give you the content you want to read, so I sincerely appreciate you both taking the time to let us know what you think.
Mike Hutchinson posted on 3/16/2018 1:53 PM
I agree with the above comment. Frankly, all the games the reviewers listed sound deadly dull. Train politics? Medieval city building? Snore. How about spotlighting more modern "betrayal" games like Battlestar Galactica or Spartacus: A Game of Blood and Treachery? Or, if you want "new" games, how about The Thing: Infection at Outpost 31. Though I personally don't like the game, there's also Betrayal (see, it's in the title) at House on the Hill or the new D&D version, Betrayal at Baldur's Gate. Speaking of D&D, any "betrayal" games list should at least mention Lords of Waterdeep. That's a game filled with betrayals.
David Covey posted on 3/15/2018 3:19 PM
First off, i'd like to say that MM is the best tabletop game store in the world, and some of your reviews help people sort through the seemingly endless supply of games, so they can get the game that better fits their style of play.
That being said, I think you should set parameters when doing group selections, such as the "Ides of March" reviewer picks. Everybody understands that 'Cosmic Encounter' is an awesome game for a lot of people, and anyone just starting into this hobby can access a dozen or more top 10 game picks, from various different experts, stating this fact. So, again, we get it! It's a great game! Perhaps we should all move forward and start to recognize more current games, so I'm suggesting this.... When you guys do group picks, try setting time parameters. Like 'Best Games of Betrayal for 2017', or '- for the last 2 years', or whatever, but keep it current. I'm not saying that you shouldn't do 'All Time' picks once per year (at the most). Beginners can easily access those annual 'All Time' lists, just like all of the other reviews you do, if they feel the need to. Submitting more current game picks also helps beginners, as well as veteran players, because it's a lot easier to find those current Greats at gaming stores, like MM, instead of trying to apprehend a copy of some OOP game via eBay, Etsy, Amazon, or whatever. That literal scavenger hunt can get quite expensive, and can also be a deterrent to beginners, who may start to feel like getting into this hobby is too expensive. That direction would be bad for businesses, like MM.
Anyway, I just wanted to point all of this out, and thank you for all that you do for this tabletop industry. Best regards.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

click here to log in